Skip to content

Keys API docs + announcement blog + changelog#2876

Open
atharvadeosthale wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
keys-api
Open

Keys API docs + announcement blog + changelog#2876
atharvadeosthale wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
keys-api

Conversation

@atharvadeosthale
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@appwrite
Copy link
Copy Markdown

appwrite bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Appwrite Website

Project ID: 69d7efb00023389e8d27

Sites (1)
Site Status Logs Preview QR
 website
69d7f2670014e24571ca
Failed Failed View Logs Preview URL QR Code

Website (appwrite/website)

Project ID: 684969cb000a2f6c0a02

Sites (1)
Site Status Logs Preview QR
 website
68496a17000f03d62013
Queued Queued View Logs Preview URL QR Code


Tip

Sites auto-generate unique domains with the pattern https://randomstring.appwrite.network

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

greptile-apps bot commented Apr 10, 2026

Greptile Summary

This PR adds the Keys API announcement blog post, a changelog entry, and expands the API keys documentation with programmatic key management (create/update/delete) across all server SDKs. The scopes table is also reorganized into accordion sections and new scopes (keys.read, keys.write, webhooks.read, webhooks.write) are documented.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge — all findings are P2 documentation suggestions with no functional impact.

The changes are purely documentation and content (markdoc files, images, generated JSON). No runtime logic is affected. The two comments are minor: one questions whether keys.read should be listed as a requirement when no read examples are provided, and one flags a missing client setup in a blog post snippet. Neither blocks the release.

src/routes/docs/advanced/platform/api-keys/+page.markdoc — verify whether the intro scope requirement matches the documented operations.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
src/routes/blog/post/announcing-api-keys-api/+page.markdoc New announcement blog post for Keys API with Node.js code examples; minor: update example omits client setup context.
src/routes/changelog/(entries)/2026-04-14.markdoc New changelog entry for Keys API release on 2026-04-14; content and links look correct.
src/routes/docs/advanced/platform/api-keys/+page.markdoc Adds programmatic key management section (create/update/delete) with full multi-SDK examples and reorganizes scopes into accordions; intro claims keys.read is required but no list/get examples are provided.
.optimize-cache.json Updated image hashes for the two refreshed create-api-key screenshots; automated change.
src/lib/generated/github-stars.json Refreshed GitHub star count from 55,439 → 55,642; routine data update.

Reviews (3): Last reviewed commit: "Apply suggestions from code review" | Re-trigger Greptile

atharvadeosthale and others added 2 commits April 10, 2026 19:46
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@adityaoberai adityaoberai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, please implement the suggested changes

Co-authored-by: Aditya Oberai <adityaoberai1@gmail.com>

## Create an API key

```server-nodejs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need examples for other server SDKs too

| `teams.write` | Access to create, update, and delete your project's teams |

{% /accordion_item %}
{% accordion_item title="Database" %}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
{% accordion_item title="Database" %}
{% accordion_item title="Databases" %}

@atharvadeosthale
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Reminder for myself - UPDATE DATES

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants