Skip to content

IGD+ computation in jMetalPy much slower than moocore #188

@MLopez-Ibanez

Description

@MLopez-Ibanez

I tried to benchmark the IGD+ code in jMetalPy against the same function moocore but jMetalPy seems between 100-1000 times slower. You can see my benchmarking code here: https://github.com/multi-objective/moocore/blob/main/python/benchmarks/bench_igdplus.py

Note that moocore also provides AHD: https://multi-objective.github.io/moocore/python/reference/functions.metrics.html#inverted-generational-distance-igd-and-igd-and-averaged-hausdorff-distance

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions